<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Eero Hippeläinen | Theragnostic Imaging</title>
    <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/author/eero-hippelainen/</link>
      <atom:link href="https://www.theragnostics.no/en/author/eero-hippelainen/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Eero Hippeläinen</description>
    <generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Time-Activity data fitting in molecular Radiotherapy: Methodology and pitfalls</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/ivashchenko-2024-time-activity/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/ivashchenko-2024-time-activity/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Absorbed radiation doses are essential in assessing the effects, e.g. safety and efficacy, of radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT). Patient-specific absorbed dose calculations in the target or the organ at risk require multiple inputs. These include the number of disintegrations in the organ, i.e. the time-integrated activities (TIAs) of the organs, as well as other parameters describing the process of radiation energy deposition in the target tissue (i.e. mean energy per disintegration, radiation dose constants, etc). TIAs are then estimated by incorporating the area under the radiopharmaceutical&amp;rsquo;s time-activity curve (TAC), which can be obtained by quantitative measurements of the biokinetics in the patient (typically based on imaging data such as planar scintigraphy, SPECT/CT, PET/CT, or blood and urine samples). The process of TAC determination/calculation for RPT generally depends on the user, e.g., the chosen number and schedule of measured time points, the selection of the fit function, the error model for the data and the fit algorithm. These decisions can strongly affect the final TIA values and thus the accuracy of calculated absorbed doses. Despite the high clinical importance of the TIA values, there is currently no consensus on processing time-activity data or even a clear understanding of the influence of uncertainties and variations in personalised RPT dosimetry related to user-dependent TAC calculation. As a first step towards minimising site-dependent variability in RPT dosimetry, this work provides an overview of quality assurance and uncertainty management considerations of the TIA estimation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Results from an EANM survey on time estimates and personnel responsible for main tasks in molecular radiotherapy dosimetry</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/gabina-2023-results/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/gabina-2023-results/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No abstract available&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>A Nordic survey of CT doses in hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT examinations</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/bebbington-2019-a/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/bebbington-2019-a/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Computed tomography (CT) scans are routinely performed in positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) examinations globally, yet few surveys have been conducted to gather national diagnostic reference level (NDRL) data for CT radiation doses in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT). In this first Nordic-wide study of CT doses in hybrid imaging, Nordic NDRL CT doses are suggested for PET/CT and SPECT/CT examinations specific to the clinical purpose of CT, and the scope for optimisation is evaluated. Data on hybrid imaging CT exposures and clinical purpose of CT were gathered for 5 PET/CT and 8 SPECT/CT examinations via designed booklet. For each included dataset for a given facility and scanner type, the computed tomography dose index by volume (CTDI&lt;sub&gt;vol&lt;/sub&gt;) and dose length product (DLP) was interpolated for a 75-kg person (referred to as CTDI&lt;sub&gt;vol,75kg&lt;/sub&gt; and DLP&lt;sub&gt;75kg&lt;/sub&gt;). Suggested NDRL (75th percentile) and achievable doses (50th percentile) were determined for CTDI&lt;sub&gt;vol,75kg&lt;/sub&gt; and DLP&lt;sub&gt;75kg&lt;/sub&gt; according to clinical purpose of CT. Differences in maximum and minimum doses (derived for a 75-kg patient) between facilities were also calculated for each examination and clinical purpose. Data were processed from 83 scanners from 43 facilities. Data were sufficient to suggest Nordic NDRL CT doses for the following: PET/CT oncology (localisation/characterisation, 15 systems); infection/inflammation (localisation/characterisation, 13 systems); brain (attenuation correction (AC) only, 11 systems); cardiac PET/CT and SPECT/CT (AC only, 30 systems); SPECT/CT lung (localisation/characterisation, 12 systems); bone (localisation/characterisation, 30 systems); and parathyroid (localisation/characterisation, 13 systems). Great variations in dose were seen for all aforementioned examinations. Greatest differences in DLP&lt;sub&gt;75kg&lt;/sub&gt; for each examination, specific to clinical purpose, were as follows: SPECT/CT lung AC only (27.4); PET/CT and SPECT/CT cardiac AC only (19.6); infection/inflammation AC only (18.1); PET/CT brain localisation/characterisation (16.8); SPECT/CT bone localisation/characterisation (10.0); PET/CT oncology AC only (9.0); and SPECT/CT parathyroid localisation/characterisation (7.8). Suggested Nordic NDRL CT doses are presented according to clinical purpose of CT for PET/CT oncology, infection/inflammation, brain, PET/CT and SPECT/CT cardiac, and SPECT/CT lung, bone, and parathyroid. The large variation in doses suggests great scope for optimisation in all 8 examinations.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
