<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner | Theragnostic Imaging</title>
    <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/author/katarina-sjogreen-gleisner/</link>
      <atom:link href="https://www.theragnostics.no/en/author/katarina-sjogreen-gleisner/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner</description>
    <generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Can 177Lu-DOTATATE Kidney Absorbed Doses be Predicted from Pretherapy SSTR PET? Findings from Multicenter Data</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/akhavanallaf-2025-can/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/akhavanallaf-2025-can/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before performing &lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu-DOTATATE therapy for neuroendocrine tumors, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) PET imaging is currently used to confirm sufficient tumor SSTR expression, but it also has potential to be used to personalize treatment by predicting absorbed doses to critical organs. This study aims to validate the predictive capability of SSTR PET in anticipating renal absorbed dose in the first cycle of &lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu-DOTATATE using a multicenter dataset to analyze and derive insights from a broader patient population.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; Retrospective data from 5 centers were included in this study: 1 in Canada (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 25), 1 in Norway (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 75), 1 in Sweden (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 18), and 2 in the United States (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 36 and &lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt; = 26). At each center, pretherapy SSTR PET/CT imaging and postcycle 1 &lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu imaging-based dosimetry were performed according to site-specific protocols. The mixed-effects model treating centers as random effects was developed using baseline SSTR PET renal uptake values to predict renal absorbed dose from &lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu-DOTATATE. Additionally, leave-one-center-out cross-validation and leave-one-sample-out cross-validation were implemented for external and internal validation, respectively, measuring mean absolute error and mean relative absolute error.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; Across all participating centers, the median cycle 1 renal absorbed dose was 0.56 Gy/GBq (range, 0.14-1.27 Gy/GBq), whereas the median pretherapy SSTR PET renal uptake was 110.7 Bq/mL/MBq (range, 28.6-287.7 Bq/mL/MBq). The differences among center means were statistically significant for both absorbed dose and PET uptake (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; &amp;lt; 0.0001 from 1-way ANOVA). A significant (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; &amp;lt; 0.05) correlation was observed between kidney SSTR PET uptake and &lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu-DOTATATE absorbed dose for each center (center-specific coefficient of determination ranged from 0.14 to 0.53). When data across all centers were aggregated, the mixed-effects model achieved a coefficient of determination of 0.25 (&lt;em&gt;P&lt;/em&gt; &amp;lt; 0.01), resulting in an mean absolute error of 0.15 Gy/GBq (SD, 0.11 Gy/GBq) and an mean relative absolute error of 28% (SD, 24%) for external validation and 0.12 Gy/GBq (SD, 0.10 Gy/GBq) and 22% (SD, 20%) for internal validation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; The correlations observed between SSTR PET renal uptake and &lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu-DOTATATE absorbed dose to kidneys across a multicenter population are statistically significant yet modest. The prediction model achieved a mean relative absolute error 28% or less for both external and internal validation of PET-predicted absorbed doses. The intercenter differences suggest the need for standardized imaging protocols and dosimetry workflows.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Implementation of dosimetry for molecular radiotherapy; results from a European survey</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/peters-2024-implementation/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/peters-2024-implementation/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The use of molecular radiotherapy (MRT) has been rapidly evolving over the last years. The aim of this study was to assess the current implementation of dosimetry for MRTs in Europe. A web-based questionnaire was open for treating centres between April and June 2022, and focused on 2020-2022. Questions addressed the application of 16 different MRTs, the availability and involvement of medical physicists, software used, quality assurance, as well as the target regions for dosimetry, whether treatment planning and/or verification were performed, and the dosimetric methods used. A total of 173 responses suitable for analysis was received from centres performing MRT, geographically distributed over 27 European countries. Of these, 146 centres (84 %) indicated to perform some form of dosimetry, and 97 % of these centres had a medical physicist available and almost always involved in dosimetry. The most common MRTs were &lt;sup&gt;131&lt;/sup&gt;I-based treatments for thyroid diseases and thyroid cancer, and [&lt;sup&gt;223&lt;/sup&gt;Ra]RaCl&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; for bone metastases. The implementation of dosimetry varied widely between therapies, from almost all centres performing dosimetry-based planning for microsphere treatments to none for some of the less common treatments (like &lt;sup&gt;32&lt;/sup&gt;P sodium-phosphate for myeloproliferative disease and [&lt;sup&gt;89&lt;/sup&gt;Sr]SrCl&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; for bone metastases). Over the last years, implementation of dosimetry, both for pre-therapeutic treatment planning and post-therapy absorbed dose verification, increased for several treatments, especially for microsphere treatments. For other treatments that have moved from research to clinical routine, the use of dosimetry decreased in recent years. However, there are still large differences both across and within countries.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>EFOMP policy statement NO. 19: Dosimetry in nuclear medicine therapy - Molecular radiotherapy</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/sjogreen-gleisner-2023-efomp/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/sjogreen-gleisner-2023-efomp/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (BSS Directive) includes optimisation of treatment with radiotherapeutic procedures based on patient dosimetry and verification of the absorbed doses delivered. The present policy statement summarises aspects of three directives relating to the therapeutic use of radiopharmaceuticals and medical devices, and outlines the steps needed for implementation of patient dosimetry for radioactive drugs. To support the transition from administrations of fixed activities to personalised treatments based on patient-specific dosimetry, EFOMP presents a number of recommendations including: increased networking between centres and disciplines to support data collection and development of codes-of-practice; resourcing to support an infrastructure that permits routine patient dosimetry; research funding to support investigation into individualised treatments; inter-disciplinary training and education programmes; and support for investigator led clinical trials. Close collaborations between the medical physicist and responsible practitioner are encouraged to develop a similar pathway as is routine for external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. EFOMP&amp;rsquo;s policy is to promote the roles and responsibilities of medical physics throughout Europe in the development of molecular radiotherapy to ensure patient benefit. As the BSS directive is adopted throughout Europe, unprecedented opportunities arise to develop informed treatments that will mitigate the risks of under- or over-treatments.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Traceable calibration with 177Lu and comparison of activity meters at hospitals in Norway and Sweden</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/hindorf-2023-traceable/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/hindorf-2023-traceable/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The activity meter is used to determine the activity of delivered radiopharmaceuticals, administered activity to patients and reference activity when gamma-cameras are calibrated prior to imaged-based dosimetry. The aim is to describe a procedure for cross-calibration of activity meters at different clinical sites, and report on &lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu activity results when using factory-set calibration factors compared to when calibration is performed with traceability to a primary standard. Thirty activity meters placed at seven hospitals in Norway and Sweden from four manufacturers: Capintec, Commecer, NuviaTech and Veenstra were included. A stock solution with &lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu was prepared at the local sites and measured in each activity meter with factory settings. The solution was shipped to the reference site at Lund University for measurements in a secondary standard activity meter. Deviations between local and reference activity measurements were determined for three geometries: 25-mL vial, 10-mL syringe and 1-mL syringe. The median of the deviations was 6.4 % for the 25 mL vial, 5.9 % for the 10 mL syringe and 6.8 % for the 1 mL syringe. The median of the deviations for the 25 mL vial, was 1.5 % for activity meters from Capintec, 7.0 % for Comecer, 11.0 % for NuviaTech and 2.4 % for Veenstra. The majority of the deviations were positive and the maximum deviation was 14.5 %. The activity of &lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu measured in an activity meter with factory-set dial settings may yield deviations up to 14.5%, compared to activities measured with traceability to a primary standard. This would imply an undertreatment of patients.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Results from an EANM survey on time estimates and personnel responsible for main tasks in molecular radiotherapy dosimetry</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/gabina-2023-results/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/gabina-2023-results/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No abstract available&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Dosimetry-based treatment planning for molecular radiotherapy: a summary of the 2017 report from the Internal Dosimetry Task Force</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/stokke-2017-dosimetry-based/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/stokke-2017-dosimetry-based/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European directive on basic safety standards (Council directive 2013/59 Euratom) mandates dosimetry-based treatment planning for radiopharmaceutical therapies. The directive comes into operation February 2018, and the aim of a report produced by the Internal Dosimetry Task Force of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine is to address this aspect of the directive. A summary of the report is presented. A brief review of five of the most common therapy procedures is included in the current text, focused on the potential to perform patient-specific dosimetry. In the full report, 11 different therapeutic procedures are included, allowing additional considerations of effectiveness, references to specific literature on quantitative imaging and dosimetry, and existing evidence for absorbed dose-effect correlations for each treatment. Individualized treatment planning with tracer diagnostics and verification of the absorbed doses delivered following therapy is found to be scientifically feasible for almost all procedures investigated, using quantitative imaging and/or external monitoring. Translation of this directive into clinical practice will have significant implications for resource requirements. Molecular radiotherapy is undergoing a significant expansion, and the groundwork for dosimetry-based treatment planning is already in place. The mandated individualization is likely to improve the effectiveness of the treatments, although must be adequately resourced.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
