Mattias Sandström | Theragnostic Imaging

Rethinking Dosimetry: A European Perspective

Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) is entering a new era of personalization, driven by advances in molecular imaging, radiopharmaceutical development, and a growing body of clinical evidence linking absorbed dose to treatment outcomes. Although external-beam radiotherapy has long integrated dosimetry into standard practice, RPT historically relied on fixed radiopharmaceutical activities and absorbed dose-effect relationships adapted from external-beam radiotherapy, often without accounting for the unique pharmacokinetics, absorbed dose rate dynamics, and biologic responses of systemically administered radiopharmaceuticals. As RPT expands into earlier disease stages, at which patients have longer life expectancies and better performance status, the role of dosimetry in optimizing treatment is becoming increasingly evident. However, despite growing recognition of its benefits, the implementation of dosimetry in clinical practice remains limited, partly because of a self-reinforcing cycle in which the lack of routine dosimetry limits clinical evidence, which in turn hinders its broader adoption. Breaking this cycle is essential to advancing RPT and ensuring that evaluation of dosimetry is based on clinical merit rather than logistic constraints. This article examines the current landscape of RPT dosimetry, highlighting key challenges and opportunities from a European perspective and aiming to foster a more factual and constructive discussion on the topic. We discuss the fundamental differences between dosimetry-driven treatment planning and posttherapy absorbed dose verification, emphasizing the latter as a practical entry point for clinical adoption. We underscore the need for harmonized standards, improved imaging resolution, and tailored absorbed dose-effect relationships that reflect the heterogeneity of RPT delivery and the complexity of tumor and organ responses. The paper also addresses regulatory, infrastructural, and resource barriers to RPT dosimetry implementation and highlights ongoing European initiatives to strengthen frameworks, enhance stakeholder collaboration, and integrate absorbed dose biomarkers into authorization processes and clinical decision-making. By rethinking dosimetry and promoting standardized, evidence-based approaches, the field can advance beyond fixed-activity protocols toward truly individualized RPT. However, achieving clinically feasible integration of dosimetry into routine practice requires structured efforts to generate high-quality clinical evidence and improve accessibility. Ultimately, reliable, patient-centered dosimetry has the potential to enhance therapeutic efficacy, manage toxicity more effectively, and support the long-term evolution of RPT as a cornerstone of precision oncology.

Time-Activity data fitting in molecular Radiotherapy: Methodology and pitfalls

Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0000

Absorbed radiation doses are essential in assessing the effects, e.g. safety and efficacy, of radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT). Patient-specific absorbed dose calculations in the target or the organ at risk require multiple inputs. These include the number of disintegrations in the organ, i.e. the time-integrated activities (TIAs) of the organs, as well as other parameters describing the process of radiation energy deposition in the target tissue (i.e. mean energy per disintegration, radiation dose constants, etc). TIAs are then estimated by incorporating the area under the radiopharmaceutical’s time-activity curve (TAC), which can be obtained by quantitative measurements of the biokinetics in the patient (typically based on imaging data such as planar scintigraphy, SPECT/CT, PET/CT, or blood and urine samples). The process of TAC determination/calculation for RPT generally depends on the user, e.g., the chosen number and schedule of measured time points, the selection of the fit function, the error model for the data and the fit algorithm. These decisions can strongly affect the final TIA values and thus the accuracy of calculated absorbed doses. Despite the high clinical importance of the TIA values, there is currently no consensus on processing time-activity data or even a clear understanding of the influence of uncertainties and variations in personalised RPT dosimetry related to user-dependent TAC calculation. As a first step towards minimising site-dependent variability in RPT dosimetry, this work provides an overview of quality assurance and uncertainty management considerations of the TIA estimation.

Traceable calibration with 177Lu and comparison of activity meters at hospitals in Norway and Sweden

Fri, 01 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0000

The activity meter is used to determine the activity of delivered radiopharmaceuticals, administered activity to patients and reference activity when gamma-cameras are calibrated prior to imaged-based dosimetry. The aim is to describe a procedure for cross-calibration of activity meters at different clinical sites, and report on ¹⁷⁷Lu activity results when using factory-set calibration factors compared to when calibration is performed with traceability to a primary standard. Thirty activity meters placed at seven hospitals in Norway and Sweden from four manufacturers: Capintec, Commecer, NuviaTech and Veenstra were included. A stock solution with ¹⁷⁷Lu was prepared at the local sites and measured in each activity meter with factory settings. The solution was shipped to the reference site at Lund University for measurements in a secondary standard activity meter. Deviations between local and reference activity measurements were determined for three geometries: 25-mL vial, 10-mL syringe and 1-mL syringe. The median of the deviations was 6.4 % for the 25 mL vial, 5.9 % for the 10 mL syringe and 6.8 % for the 1 mL syringe. The median of the deviations for the 25 mL vial, was 1.5 % for activity meters from Capintec, 7.0 % for Comecer, 11.0 % for NuviaTech and 2.4 % for Veenstra. The majority of the deviations were positive and the maximum deviation was 14.5 %. The activity of ¹⁷⁷Lu measured in an activity meter with factory-set dial settings may yield deviations up to 14.5%, compared to activities measured with traceability to a primary standard. This would imply an undertreatment of patients.

Correction to: EANM enabling guide: how to improve the accessibility of clinical dosimetry

Tue, 01 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0000

No abstract available

EANM enabling guide: how to improve the accessibility of clinical dosimetry

Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0000

Dosimetry can be a useful tool for personalization of molecular radiotherapy (MRT) procedures, enabling the continuous development of theranostic concepts. However, the additional resource requirements are often seen as a barrier to implementation. This guide discusses the requirements for dosimetry and demonstrates how a dosimetry regimen can be tailored to the available facilities of a centre. The aim is to help centres wishing to initiate a dosimetry service but may not have the experience or resources of some of the more established therapy and dosimetry centres. The multidisciplinary approach and different personnel requirements are discussed and key equipment reviewed example protocols demonstrating these factors are given in the supplementary material for the main therapies carried out in nuclear medicine, including [¹³¹I]-NaI for benign thyroid disorders, [¹⁷⁷Lu]-DOTATATE and ¹³¹I-mIBG for neuroendocrine tumours and [⁹⁰Y]-microspheres for unresectable hepatic carcinoma.

Dosimetry-based treatment planning for molecular radiotherapy: a summary of the 2017 report from the Internal Dosimetry Task Force

Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000

The European directive on basic safety standards (Council directive 2013/59 Euratom) mandates dosimetry-based treatment planning for radiopharmaceutical therapies. The directive comes into operation February 2018, and the aim of a report produced by the Internal Dosimetry Task Force of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine is to address this aspect of the directive. A summary of the report is presented. A brief review of five of the most common therapy procedures is included in the current text, focused on the potential to perform patient-specific dosimetry. In the full report, 11 different therapeutic procedures are included, allowing additional considerations of effectiveness, references to specific literature on quantitative imaging and dosimetry, and existing evidence for absorbed dose-effect correlations for each treatment. Individualized treatment planning with tracer diagnostics and verification of the absorbed doses delivered following therapy is found to be scientifically feasible for almost all procedures investigated, using quantitative imaging and/or external monitoring. Translation of this directive into clinical practice will have significant implications for resource requirements. Molecular radiotherapy is undergoing a significant expansion, and the groundwork for dosimetry-based treatment planning is already in place. The mandated individualization is likely to improve the effectiveness of the treatments, although must be adequately resourced.