<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Mona-Elisabeth R Revheim | Theragnostic Imaging</title>
    <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/author/mona-elisabeth-r-revheim/</link>
      <atom:link href="https://www.theragnostics.no/en/author/mona-elisabeth-r-revheim/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Mona-Elisabeth R Revheim</description>
    <generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Rethinking Dosimetry: A European Perspective</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/tran-gia-2025-rethinking/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/tran-gia-2025-rethinking/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) is entering a new era of personalization, driven by advances in molecular imaging, radiopharmaceutical development, and a growing body of clinical evidence linking absorbed dose to treatment outcomes. Although external-beam radiotherapy has long integrated dosimetry into standard practice, RPT historically relied on fixed radiopharmaceutical activities and absorbed dose-effect relationships adapted from external-beam radiotherapy, often without accounting for the unique pharmacokinetics, absorbed dose rate dynamics, and biologic responses of systemically administered radiopharmaceuticals. As RPT expands into earlier disease stages, at which patients have longer life expectancies and better performance status, the role of dosimetry in optimizing treatment is becoming increasingly evident. However, despite growing recognition of its benefits, the implementation of dosimetry in clinical practice remains limited, partly because of a self-reinforcing cycle in which the lack of routine dosimetry limits clinical evidence, which in turn hinders its broader adoption. Breaking this cycle is essential to advancing RPT and ensuring that evaluation of dosimetry is based on clinical merit rather than logistic constraints. This article examines the current landscape of RPT dosimetry, highlighting key challenges and opportunities from a European perspective and aiming to foster a more factual and constructive discussion on the topic. We discuss the fundamental differences between dosimetry-driven treatment planning and posttherapy absorbed dose verification, emphasizing the latter as a practical entry point for clinical adoption. We underscore the need for harmonized standards, improved imaging resolution, and tailored absorbed dose-effect relationships that reflect the heterogeneity of RPT delivery and the complexity of tumor and organ responses. The paper also addresses regulatory, infrastructural, and resource barriers to RPT dosimetry implementation and highlights ongoing European initiatives to strengthen frameworks, enhance stakeholder collaboration, and integrate absorbed dose biomarkers into authorization processes and clinical decision-making. By rethinking dosimetry and promoting standardized, evidence-based approaches, the field can advance beyond fixed-activity protocols toward truly individualized RPT. However, achieving clinically feasible integration of dosimetry into routine practice requires structured efforts to generate high-quality clinical evidence and improve accessibility. Ultimately, reliable, patient-centered dosimetry has the potential to enhance therapeutic efficacy, manage toxicity more effectively, and support the long-term evolution of RPT as a cornerstone of precision oncology.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Intensifying treatment in PET-positive multiple myeloma patients after upfront autologous stem cell transplantation</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/n%C3%B8rgaard-2023-intensifying/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/n%C3%B8rgaard-2023-intensifying/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET) positivity after first-line treatment with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma is strongly correlated with reduced progression-free and overall survival. However, PET-positive patients who achieve PET negativity after treatment seem to have comparable outcomes to patients who were PET negative at diagnosis. Hence, giving PET-positive patients additional treatment may improve their outcome. In this phase II study, we screened first-line patients with very good partial response (VGPR) or better after ASCT with PET. PET-positive patients received four 28-day cycles of carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd). Flow cytometry-based minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis was performed before and after treatment for correlation with PET. Overall, 159 patients were screened with PET. A total of 53 patients (33%) were PET positive and 57% of PET-positive patients were MRD negative, demonstrating that these response assessments are complementary. KRd consolidation converted 33% of PET-positive patients into PET negativity. MRD-negative patients were more likely to convert than MRD-positive patients. In summary, PET after ASCT detected residual disease in a substantial proportion of patients in VGPR or better, even in patients who were MRD negative, and KRd consolidation treatment changed PET status in 33% of patients.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Imaging of 212Pb in mice with a clinical SPECT/CT</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/kvassheim-2023-imaging/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/kvassheim-2023-imaging/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;sup&gt;212&lt;/sup&gt;Pb is a promising radionuclide for targeted alpha therapy. Here, the feasibility of visualising the tumour uptake and biodistribution of &lt;sup&gt;212&lt;/sup&gt;Pb-NG001 in mice with a clinical SPECT/CT scanner was investigated. A mouse phantom with &lt;sup&gt;212&lt;/sup&gt;Pb was imaged with a clinical- and a preclinical SPECT/CT scanner. Different acquisition and reconstruction settings were investigated on the clinical system (Siemens Symbia Intevo Bold). Two athymic nude mice carrying PC-3 PIP prostate cancer tumours of 235-830 μl received 1.44 MBq of &lt;sup&gt;212&lt;/sup&gt;Pb-NG001 and were imaged 2, 6, and 24 h post-injection on the clinical SPECT/CT with a Medium Energy collimator and a 40% energy window centred on 79 keV. All acquisition times were 30 min, except the mouse imaging 24 h post-injection which was 60 min. After the final imaging, the organs were harvested and measured on a gamma counter to give an indication of how much activity was present in organs of interest at the last imaging time point. Four volumes in the mouse phantom of ~ 300 μl with 246-303 kBq/ml of &lt;sup&gt;212&lt;/sup&gt;Pb were distinguishable on images acquired with the clinical SPECT/CT with a high number of reconstruction updates. With the preclinical SPECT, the same volumes were easily distinguished with 49 kBq/ml of &lt;sup&gt;212&lt;/sup&gt;Pb. Clinical SPECT/CT images of the mice revealed uptake in tumours and bladders 2 h after injection and in tumours containing down to approximately 15 kBq/ml at 6 and 24 h after injection. Although the preclinical scanner should be used preferentially in biodistribution studies in mice, the clinical SPECT/CT confirmed uptake in small volumes (e.g. ~ 300 μl volume with ~ 250 kBq/ml). Regardless of system, the resolution and sensitivity limits should be carefully determined, otherwise false negative or too low uptakes can be wrongly interpreted.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Correction to: Quantitative SPECT/CT imaging of lead-212: a phantom study</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/kvassheim-2022-correction/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/kvassheim-2022-correction/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No abstract available&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Quantitative SPECT/CT imaging of lead-212: a phantom study</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/kvassheim-2022-quantitative/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/kvassheim-2022-quantitative/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lead-212 (&lt;sup&gt;212&lt;/sup&gt;Pb) is a promising radionuclide for targeted therapy, as it decays to α-particle emitter bismuth-212 (&lt;sup&gt;212&lt;/sup&gt;Bi) via β-particle emission. This extends the problematic short half-life of &lt;sup&gt;212&lt;/sup&gt;Bi. In preparation for upcoming clinical trials with &lt;sup&gt;212&lt;/sup&gt;Pb, the feasibility of quantitative single photon-emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging of &lt;sup&gt;212&lt;/sup&gt;Pb was studied, with the purpose to explore the possibility of individualised patient dosimetric estimation. Both acquisition parameters (combining two different energy windows and two different collimators) and iterative reconstruction parameters (varying the iterations x subsets between 10 × 1, 15 × 1, 30 × 1, 30 × 2, 30 × 3, 30 × 4, and 30 × 30) were investigated to evaluate visual quality and quantitative uncertainties based on phantom images. Calibration factors were determined using a homogeneous phantom and were stable when the total activity imaged exceeded 1 MBq for all the imaging protocols studied, but they increased sharply as the activity decayed below 1 MBq. Both a 20% window centred on 239 keV and a 40% window on 79 keV, with dual scatter windows of 5% and 20%, respectively, could be used. Visual quality at the lowest activity concentrations was improved with the High Energy collimator and the 79 keV energy window. Fractional uncertainty in the activity quantitation, including uncertainties from calibration factors and small volume effects, in spheres of 2.6 ml in the NEMA phantom was 16-21% for all protocols with the 30 × 4 filtered reconstruction except the High Energy collimator with the 239 keV energy window. Quantitative analysis was possible both with and without filters, but the visual quality of the images improved with a filter. Only minor differences were observed between the imaging protocols which were all determined suitable for quantitative imaging of &lt;sup&gt;212&lt;/sup&gt;Pb. As uncertainties generally decreased with increasing iterative updates in the reconstruction and recovery curves did not converge with few iterations, a high number of reconstruction updates are recommended for quantitative imaging.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
