<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ragnar Bruvoll | Theragnostic Imaging</title>
    <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/author/ragnar-bruvoll/</link>
      <atom:link href="https://www.theragnostics.no/en/author/ragnar-bruvoll/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Ragnar Bruvoll</description>
    <generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Correlations between [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC Uptake and Absorbed Dose from [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/bruvoll-2023-correlations/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/bruvoll-2023-correlations/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aim of this paper was to investigate correlations between pre- therapeutic [&lt;sup&gt;68&lt;/sup&gt;Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC uptake and absorbed dose to tumours from therapy with [&lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. This retrospective study included 301 tumours from 54 GEP-NET patients. The tumours were segmented on pre-therapeutic [&lt;sup&gt;68&lt;/sup&gt;Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT, and post-therapy [&lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT images, using a fixed 40% threshold. The SPECT/CT images were used for absorbed dose calculations by assuming a linear build-up from time zero to day one, and mono-exponential wash-out after that. Both SUV&lt;sub&gt;mean&lt;/sub&gt; and SUV&lt;sub&gt;max&lt;/sub&gt; were measured from the PET images. A linear absorbed-dose prediction model was formed with SUV&lt;sub&gt;mean&lt;/sub&gt; as the independent variable, and the accuracy was tested with a split 70-30 training-test set. Mean SUV&lt;sub&gt;mean&lt;/sub&gt; and SUV&lt;sub&gt;max&lt;/sub&gt; from [&lt;sup&gt;68&lt;/sup&gt;Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET was 24.0 (3.6-84.4) and 41.0 (6.7-146.5), and the mean absorbed dose from [&lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE was 26.9 Gy (2.4-101.9). A linear relationship between SUV&lt;sub&gt;mean&lt;/sub&gt; and [&lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE activity concentration at 24 h post injection was found (R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.44, &lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt; &amp;lt; 0.05). In the prediction model, a root mean squared error and a mean absolute error of 1.77 and 1.33 Gy/GBq, respectively, were found for the test set. There was a high inter- and intra-patient variability in tumour measurements, both for [&lt;sup&gt;68&lt;/sup&gt;Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC SUVs and absorbed doses from [&lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Depending on the required accuracy, [&lt;sup&gt;68&lt;/sup&gt;Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET imaging may estimate the [&lt;sup&gt;177&lt;/sup&gt;Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE uptake. However, there could be a high variance between predicted and actual absorbed doses.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
