<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Syed Nuruddin | Theragnostic Imaging</title>
    <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/author/syed-nuruddin/</link>
      <atom:link href="https://www.theragnostics.no/en/author/syed-nuruddin/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Syed Nuruddin</description>
    <generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Comparison of [18F]fluciclovine and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients</title>
      <link>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/stokke-2022-comparison/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.theragnostics.no/en/publications/stokke-2022-comparison/</guid>
      <description>&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma (MM) is currently the best technology to demonstrate patchy and extramedullary disease. However, [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]FDG PET has some limitations, and imaging with alternative tracers should be explored. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the performance of [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]fluciclovine PET compared to [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]FDG PET in newly diagnosed MM patients. Thirteen newly diagnosed transplant eligible MM patients were imaged both with [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]FDG PET/CT and [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]fluciclovine PET/CT within 1 week in a prospective study. The subjects were visually assessed positive or negative for disease. The number of lesions and the SUV&lt;sub&gt;max&lt;/sub&gt; of selected lesions were measured for both tracers. Furthermore, tracer uptake ratios were obtained by dividing lesion SUV&lt;sub&gt;max&lt;/sub&gt; by blood or bone marrow SUV&lt;sub&gt;max&lt;/sub&gt;. Between-group differences and correlations were assessed with paired t-tests and Pearson tests. Bone marrow SUVs were compared to bone marrow plasma cell percentage in biopsy samples. Nine subjects were assessed positively by [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]FDG PET (69%) and 12 positives by [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]fluciclovine PET (92%). All positive subjects had [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]fluciclovine scans that were qualitatively scored as easier to interpret visually than the [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]FDG scans. The number of lesions was also higher; seven of nine subjects with distinct hot spots on [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]fluciclovine PET had fewer or no visible lesions on [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]FDG PET. The mean lesion SUV&lt;sub&gt;max&lt;/sub&gt; values were 8.2 and 3.8 for [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]fluciclovine and [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]FDG, respectively. The mean tumour to blood values were 6.4 and 2.0 for [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]fluciclovine and [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]FDG, and the mean ratios between tumour and bone marrow were 2.1 and 1.5 for [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]fluciclovine and [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]FDG. The lesion SUV&lt;sub&gt;max&lt;/sub&gt; and ratios were significantly higher for [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]fluciclovine (all p &amp;lt; 0.01). Local [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]fluciclovine SUV&lt;sub&gt;max&lt;/sub&gt; or SUV&lt;sub&gt;mean&lt;/sub&gt; values in os ilium and the percentage of plasma cells in bone marrow biopsies were linearly correlated (p = 0.048). There were no significant correlations between [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]FDG SUVs and plasma cells (p = 0.82). Based on this pilot study, [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]fluciclovine is a promising tracer for MM. The visual and semi-quantitative evaluations indicate that [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]fluciclovine PET/CT can out-perform [&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;F]FDG PET/CT at diagnosis.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
